| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.10.03 17:36:00 -
[1]
So the revised bailout has been approved by both congress and the senate and they are saying the president may even be able to sign it today. Anyone understand what the new bailout will do for the average individual? -------------------------------- To borrow a phrase:
Players who post are like stars, there are bright ones and those who are dim.
|

Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 01:43:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Thorliaron
Originally by: Neverine Crux
Originally by: MineralOel Steuer
Originally by: Pwett
it's ok for Bush.
At least this is his real legacy to the World, not some unimportant war in Afg. or Irak which are lost anyway.
It's lost how?
Because the taliban are still there and are as strong as they where 7 years ago?
You seriously expect a government in exile to be wiped out in less than 7 years? By your arguement you could claim that the allys lost WW2 because the **** movement is still alive and well in various parts of the world.
|

Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 02:10:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Jacob Mei on 04/10/2008 02:12:27
Originally by: Thorliaron Edited by: Thorliaron on 04/10/2008 01:49:31
Originally by: Jacob Mei
Originally by: Thorliaron
Originally by: Neverine Crux
Originally by: MineralOel Steuer
Originally by: Pwett
it's ok for Bush.
At least this is his real legacy to the World, not some unimportant war in Afg. or Irak which are lost anyway.
It's lost how?
Because the taliban are still there and are as strong as they where 7 years ago?
You seriously expect a government in exile to be wiped out in less than 7 years? By your arguement you could claim that the allys lost WW2 because the **** movement is still alive and well in various parts of the world.
errr except all the major players in the **** movement killed themselves or died/where caught soon after the end of ww2 where as osama and his cheifs are still around.
The Taliban is not Binladins organization but was a government that harbored him and refused to surrender him to the US when it was discovered that he was in Afganastan. Bin ladins organization is Al-Qaeda which the US military forces, according to wiki, 2/3rds of the "major players" have either been caught or killed.
So yeah, I wouldnt call this a war that hasnt seen results, just an unpopular one.
Also, there are cases of **** and Japanese officers that escaped capture and trial after the war ended by going underground.
|

Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 17:06:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Thorliaron
Bin Laden was able to forge an alliance between the Taliban and his Al-Qaeda organization. It is understood that al-Qaeda-trained fighters known as the 055 Brigade were integrated with the Taliban army between 1997 and 2001. During Osama bin Laden's stay in Afghanistan, he may have helped finance the Taliban. He even blew up Northern Alliance leader for them, they are one and the same.
Hardly, thats called being an Ally. The only way the Taliban and Al-Qaeda could be one and the same is if Al-Qaeda was created because the Taliban commissioned its formation or if bin Laden was a part of the Taliban government, both of which were not the case. Anyway this is besides the point. -------------------------------- To borrow a phrase:
Players who post are like stars, there are bright ones and those who are dim.
|

Jacob Mei
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 15:55:00 -
[5]
So who thinks the market will plunge further today or recoop some of its losses? Any takers? Come on with this roller coaster ride anything is possible. -------------------------------- To borrow a phrase:
Players who post are like stars, there are bright ones and those who are dim.
|
| |
|